By JC Bowman
The 114th General Assembly did not sit still on education. Lawmakers advanced a wide slate of policies—expanding school choice, increasing funding, addressing workforce shortages, and tightening accountability. By any measure, it was an active session. Nearly 600 education bills were filed, and over 200 passed.
The most consequential decision was clear: Tennessee expanded its Education Freedom Scholarship program from 20,000 to 35,000 students. That is no longer a pilot. It is policy. Lawmakers also added funding protections for school districts losing enrollment and required reporting on why students leave—an acknowledgment that growth in one area creates pressure elsewhere.
At the same time, the state continued to make a significant investment in public education. The budget includes hundreds of millions in new funding, continued progress toward a $50,000 starting teacher salary, and targeted support for summer learning and student mental health. Whatever the rhetoric, the legislature did not completely walk away from traditional public schools this year.
Did it do enough? We believe there is more to do and more work ahead for us. We encourage educators and parents to be a critical source of information and a voice for our state’s children, especially those in their communities. To strengthen their position as an education expert and resource, regularly provide information, updates, and feedback to the policymaker’s office. Take advantage of all channels, including letters, emails, in-person meetings, town halls, and site visits. We desperately need a debate among the Governor candidates to hear their plans for education, and we need them to hear from K-12 educators and parents.

There was also a strong push in the legislature on early childhood and workforce issues. Expanding Pre-K access, creating apprenticeship pathways for educators, allowing supervised youth employment in childcare, and cutting duplicative regulations are practical steps to address a real problem: not enough adults in the system to meet growing demand.
On the student side, lawmakers focused on the day-to-day experience. New policies limit excessive screen time in the early grades, require local districts to set clearer rules for device use, and increase physical activity requirements for elementary students. These are not headline-grabbing changes, but they reflect a growing recognition that how students learn matters as much as what they learn.
Accountability was addressed—though unevenly. The state put new pressure on underperforming virtual schools, including the possibility of closure following sustained low performance. At the same time, adjustments to testing requirements in existing ESA programs introduced greater flexibility, raising familiar concerns about whether outcomes will remain comparable across systems.
The legislature also stepped directly into governance. The decision to enable state intervention in Memphis-Shelby County Schools signals a willingness to take control when results lag. Whether that produces better outcomes—or simply shifts responsibility—depends on execution, not on intent.
Other measures rounded out the session: faster student record transfers, protections for learning pods and microschools, updates to funding formulas, and new requirements for curriculum transparency and the display of historical documents.
Taken together, this session was defined by movement. More choice. More funding. More state involvement. More flexibility in some areas and more structure in others. Individually, most of these decisions are defensible. Collectively, they indicate that the system is still in transition.
The legislature has expanded opportunity and increased investment simultaneously. That is the easy part. The harder part comes next—proving that these changes, taken together, improve student outcomes. Because passing bills is measurable, the success of legislation cannot yet be proven.
#####
JC Bowman is the Executive Director of Professional Educators of Tennessee, a non-partisan teacher association headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author and the association are properly cited. For more information on this subject or any education issue please contact Professional Educators of Tennessee. To schedule an interview please contact info@proedtn.org or 1-800-471-4867.

Legal Notice: This message and any attachments may contain confidential and legally privileged information. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the named addressee(s). Please refrain from including sensitive data, such as social security numbers and passwords, in non-encrypted emails and non-password-protected email attachments when responding. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Suppose the reader of this message is not the intended recipient (or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipients). In that case, you are notified that you have confidential and privileged information and are officially notified that any unauthorized distribution or copying of this communication or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named addressee, you should not copy, alter, post, forward, distribute, or disseminate the contents of the e-mail, either whole or partial, or attachments without the sender’s written permission. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake, and delete this e-mail from your system. Any views or opinions expressed may solely be those of the individual and may not necessarily represent those of Professional Educators of Tennessee (ProEdTN or PET). Please note That Emails sent from a government computer or a government-issued email account are not considered private.








You must be logged in to post a comment.